A lot is being said about the 45 minute threshold for unlimited annual members -- cross the threshold and you start paying fees. This means that if you take a single ride for greater than 45 minutes without docking and switching bikes, you will have to pay more than the $103/year.
I think this is a non-issue, and Google Maps is around to back me up. If you use the bike directions on Google Maps, it will tell you the estimated time of your trip. So I tried it out. I started at West 60th Street & Columbus Avenue, at the northern edge of CitiBike's initial station range. Then I plugged in Battery Park as my destination, at the southern tip of Manhattan.
According to Google Maps, the route along the Hudson River Greenway should take an average rider 33 minutes, leaving 12 minutes under the 45 minute threshold in case of delays.
CitiBike offers protection from crossing the threshold. Just dock the bike, wait a few minutes, and take out another one.
CitiBike is primarily for transportation, not bike tourism or long-haul rides. You can do these latter functions on CitiBike, but you will need to switch bikes at an interim station. You're better off renting from a bike tour outfit or a local bike shop, which have better bikes for cruising anyway.
As for the $103 annual fee, it is an amazing bargain! And the more you use CitiBike, the cheaper it gets!
Wednesday, April 17, 2013
Thursday, February 28, 2013
Parking Lots and Leaf Blowers
People rarely think of parking lots and leaf blowers at the same time, and why should they? Parking lots are large areas with impervious surfaces used for storing cars. Leaf blowers are motorized yard tools used for moving organic matter like leaves and grass clippings.
Yet nowadays, you almost never find a parking lot without a leaf blower. Why?
Most owners of parking lots have a "clean" fetish for keeping their lots free of all organic matter. The black surface of the parking lot increases the visibility of the lighter-colored organic matter -- even small particles like seeds or pollen -- and appears to tap a visceral "cleanliness" impulse in owners. They are willing use "any means necessary" to remove this matter from their pristine blacktop, lest others think they are dirty or messy.
Which brings me to leaf blowers. These ridiculously noisy and highly polluting devices are extreme overkill for the organic matter on parking lots. They emit a disproportionate amount of carbon for the task, which in this time of climate change, is something that should be avoided unless absolutely necessary.
For those not bothered by the pollution and noise of blowers (although after Hurricane Sandy, I can't think of anyone that I know), this is not a problem. But for everyone else, it is. In my home county near New York City, ten municipalities have passed strict seasonal bans on blowers. How much carbon are we talking about? Here's an Edmunds.com review of the huge Ford Raptor truck for a little perspective:
"The hydrocarbon emissions from a half-hour of yard work with the two-stroke leaf blower are about the same as a 3,900-mile drive from Texas to Alaska in a Raptor," said Jason Kavanagh, engineering editor at Edmunds.com. "As ridiculous as it may sound, it is more 'green' to ditch your yard equipment and find a way to blow leaves using a Raptor."
Which brings me back to parking lots. It is the end of February today, and I live near a business that serves as a catering hall. The snow has melted and there is some organic matter on the parking lot. The matter doesn't impede walking or driving, but to someone with a parking lot "clean" fetish, it appears "dirty."
So at 6:30AM, I was rudely awoken by the sound of three blowers -- two push blowers and one backpack -- "cleaning" the parking lot. It is a big lot, so it took an hour.
So next time a local business asks to install or expand a parking lot, remember what else that includes.
Yet nowadays, you almost never find a parking lot without a leaf blower. Why?
Most owners of parking lots have a "clean" fetish for keeping their lots free of all organic matter. The black surface of the parking lot increases the visibility of the lighter-colored organic matter -- even small particles like seeds or pollen -- and appears to tap a visceral "cleanliness" impulse in owners. They are willing use "any means necessary" to remove this matter from their pristine blacktop, lest others think they are dirty or messy.
Which brings me to leaf blowers. These ridiculously noisy and highly polluting devices are extreme overkill for the organic matter on parking lots. They emit a disproportionate amount of carbon for the task, which in this time of climate change, is something that should be avoided unless absolutely necessary.
For those not bothered by the pollution and noise of blowers (although after Hurricane Sandy, I can't think of anyone that I know), this is not a problem. But for everyone else, it is. In my home county near New York City, ten municipalities have passed strict seasonal bans on blowers. How much carbon are we talking about? Here's an Edmunds.com review of the huge Ford Raptor truck for a little perspective:
"The hydrocarbon emissions from a half-hour of yard work with the two-stroke leaf blower are about the same as a 3,900-mile drive from Texas to Alaska in a Raptor," said Jason Kavanagh, engineering editor at Edmunds.com. "As ridiculous as it may sound, it is more 'green' to ditch your yard equipment and find a way to blow leaves using a Raptor."
Which brings me back to parking lots. It is the end of February today, and I live near a business that serves as a catering hall. The snow has melted and there is some organic matter on the parking lot. The matter doesn't impede walking or driving, but to someone with a parking lot "clean" fetish, it appears "dirty."
So at 6:30AM, I was rudely awoken by the sound of three blowers -- two push blowers and one backpack -- "cleaning" the parking lot. It is a big lot, so it took an hour.
So next time a local business asks to install or expand a parking lot, remember what else that includes.
Sunday, August 12, 2012
Even the wealthy need mass transit
The image of mass transit as only for the working and middle classes is widespread. Yet a recent web advertisement suggests that the wealthy need mass transit too.
I clicked through a web ad recently for the new, very expensive ($495/year membership) credit card called Visa Black Card. The card offers all sorts of exclusive benefits to cardholders like access to VIP clubs in airports and 24/7 telephone Concierge Service that one would expect for such a high annual membership fee. Then I looked at what the Concierge Service provided, and this one jumped off the page:
"Mass transportation information and schedules"
More surprising is that this service, described on the webpage linked to the ad, is promoted above car rental, hotel, and flight information. Obviously, Visa's ad agency thinks their wealthy clients need mass transportation information far more than those other services.
I clicked through a web ad recently for the new, very expensive ($495/year membership) credit card called Visa Black Card. The card offers all sorts of exclusive benefits to cardholders like access to VIP clubs in airports and 24/7 telephone Concierge Service that one would expect for such a high annual membership fee. Then I looked at what the Concierge Service provided, and this one jumped off the page:
"Mass transportation information and schedules"
More surprising is that this service, described on the webpage linked to the ad, is promoted above car rental, hotel, and flight information. Obviously, Visa's ad agency thinks their wealthy clients need mass transportation information far more than those other services.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)